EDITOR’S NOTE: Todd Starnes owns one of the top conservative radio stations in the nation. Click here to download his free app so you can listen to conservative news and talk 24-7.
The Supreme Court is hearing a case this week that could conceivably overturn the 2020 presidential election, according to Mike Huckabee.
The case Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et. al., was brought by Raland Brunson of Ogden, Utah and his three brothers seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris because members of Congress failed to fulfill their constitutional duty on Jan. 6, 2021, by not reviewing allegations of fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
The former Arkansas governor and former Republican presidential candidate shared news of the bombshell case on Substack.
“Sit down. I guarantee this Supreme Court story is real,” Huckabee began.
“The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably — PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots — overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher,” he wrote.
The case was added to the court’s docket for Friday, the anniversary of Jan. 6, and the day President Biden is set to give a speech commemorating the Capitol breach.
The Brunson brothers argue in their lawsuit — without legal counsel — that 388 lawmakers took an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” but “purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate [allegations of fraud in the 2020 election], whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy.”
They point to Jan. 6, 2021 when the 117th Congress held proceedings to count votes under the Twelfth Amendment.
“During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by Respondents,” the brothers argued.
The suit names President Biden, VP Harris, former VP Pence, and 385 members of Congress, and, no, that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that “enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election.” So, this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It’s about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution –- allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues.
In their words: “Is this about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.” The suit says this violation is an act of treason and fraud. “A successfully rigged election has the same effect as an act of war: to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.”
“When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.”
Huckabee points out, “If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for.”
Could former President Trump be restored to office? Possibly.
“Even if a majority of the Justices found merit in this case, would they be willing to do something this huge?” Huckabee asked. “They would be keeping in mind the potential consequences and, of course, possible effects on the balance of power. If this happened, it would be the wildest things ever to happen within our government — a purge, really, which, I have to admit, sounds pretty great with the state our country is currently in. But you know the saying, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.”