BREAKING: Supreme Court Saves Womens Sports
LIVE COVERAGE: No men in women’s sports! The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark victory Tuesday for states seeking to preserve women’s sports, ruling 6-3 that Idaho and West Virginia may restrict girls’ and women’s athletic teams to biological females.
The consolidated cases, Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., overturn lower court rulings that had blocked enforcement of the state laws. The decision is expected to affect similar laws already enacted in more than two dozen states.
“Today, the Supreme Court stood for truth,” said Tina Descovich, the co-founder of Moms for Liberty. “The highest court in the land has correctly identified what a woman is, and no amount of therapy or medical intervention can change that.”
“For too long, our daughters have been forced to compete against biological males in sports, share locker rooms and private spaces with them, and watch their opportunities stolen. This is a win for every girl who has trained for thousands of hours only to lose to a stronger male competitor. It is a win for every mother who refused to stay silent. At Moms for Liberty, standing for truth is our number one value. We will continue fighting to protect our daughters, because when we abandon truth, pain and injustice always follow.”
The Court concluded that the Constitution and Title IX do not prevent states from separating athletic competition based on biological sex. The majority emphasized that states have a legitimate interest in protecting fair athletic competition for women and girls.
“I can train 20 hours a week,” one female cyclist told John Stossel, “But I cannot train to be a man.”
In its opinion, the Court wrote that Title IX permits states to distinguish athletic teams on the basis of biological sex, allowing lawmakers to preserve “fair and safe competition for women and girls.”
Idaho officials argued throughout the litigation that “sex is what matters in sports” because of physiological differences including bone density, muscle mass, and cardiovascular capacity. During oral arguments, Idaho Solicitor General Alan Hurst told the justices that biological sex “correlates strongly with countless athletic advantages.”
West Virginia defended its law by arguing that “biological sex matters in athletics in ways both obvious and undeniable,” maintaining that Title IX was enacted to create equal opportunities for female athletes.
The ruling marks another significant victory for states defending sex-based policies after the Court’s 2025 decision upholding Tennessee’s restrictions on gender-transition treatments for minors. In that opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “Our role is not ‘to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic’ of the law before us, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
The decision represents one of the most consequential rulings of the Court’s term and is expected to shape future legal battles over Title IX, women’s athletics, and state authority to regulate participation in school sports.
“Today’s Supreme Court decision upholding fairness in women’s sports is a win for common sense and young athletes across the country,” Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said. “As the parents of three daughters, Marty and I applaud this further protection of Title IX for Georgia’s women and young girls.”
My new book is available to order online. “The Golden Age: How Trump Saved America.” Get a copy today at Amazon or Barnes and Noble.